Archive for the ‘SPP’ Category

If this is Mexico’s idea of espionage……..

From Fox

Secret Service Catch Mexican Official Nabbing White House BlackBerries

Sources with knowledge of the incident said the official, whose first name is Rafael, took six or seven of the handheld devices from a table outside a special room in the hotel where the Mexican delegation was meeting with President Bush.

Everyone entering the room was required to leave their cell phones, BlackBerries and other such devices on the table, a commonplace practice when high-level meetings are held. American officials discovered their missing belongings when they were leaving the session.

It didn’t take long before Secret Service officials reviewed videotape taken by a surveillance camera and found footage showing “Rafael” absconding with the BlackBerries.

Sources said “Rafael” made it all the way to the airport, where the Mexican president was preparing to leave New Orleans, before Secret Service officers caught up with him. He was forced to return the BlackBerries.

Sources said the man claimed to have taken the devices accidentally. The sources said they believe no further actions were taken against him by American authorities, though it is unclear what disciplinary measures, if any, await him in Mexico.

Technorati Tags: SPP, SPP Summit, New Orleans, Mexico, espionage

Now instead of calling this the North American Union (NAU) of which SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership) is a prelude, the superhighway will now be called a “regional loop“. Whenever NAU or SPP is mentioned to the Administration the mentioners are called conspiracy kooks. That’s kind of odd since all of this is documented on the government’s own site.

NAU: Conspiracy or Coverup?

To see what the elites are planning, you don’t have peek through keyholes or plant a spy under the table. Just read their published reports.

The words most frequently used to describe their goals are “economic integration,” “labor mobility,” “free movement of goods, services and people across open borders,” and “harmonization” of regulations.

The Council on Foreign Relations published a major report on May 17, 2005, only two months after the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) was announced by President Bush, Mexico’s Vicente Fox, and Canada’s Paul Martin in Waco on March 23, 2005. The CFR document explaining SPP’s goals and methodology was posted on the U.S. State Department website, thereby confirming its authenticity.

The CFR report explains that the three SPP amigos at Waco “committed their governments” to “Building a North American Community” by 2010 with a common “outer security perimeter,” “the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico,” allowing Mexican trucks “unlimited access,” “totalization” of illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, and “a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution.”

The prestigious Center for Strategic & International Studies published a report in 2007 called “North American Future 2025 Project.” It advocates “economic integration,” the “free flow of people across national borders,” and “policies that integrate governments.”

The CSIS report even calls for “harmonizing legislation” on intellectual property rights with other countries. That’s a direct attack on our U.S. patent system, which is the key to U.S. leadership in inventions and innovation.

The Hudson Institute published a 35-page White Paper in 2007 called “Negotiating North America: The Security and Prosperity Partnership.” It states that SPP is the vehicle “for economic integration” with Mexico and Canada and even “combines an agenda with a political commitment.”

The Hudson White Paper explains

that SPP’s “design” is for the executive branch to exercise full “authority” to “enforce and execute” whatever is decided by a 3-nation agreement of “civil service professionals” as though it were “law.” That means evading treaty ratification and even congressional legislation and oversight.

Don’t forget the importance of the Wall Street Journal and its longtime, very influential editorial-page editor, the late Robert Bartley. When Mexico’s Vicente Fox called for NAFTA to evolve into something like the European Union, Bartley wrote: “There is one voice north of the Rio Grande that supports his vision. To wit, this newspaper.”

One of the most influential business writers, Peter F. Drucker, wrote in his book, Post-Capitalist Society, that “The economic integration of the three countries into one region is proceeding so fast that it will make little difference whether the marriage is sanctified legally or not.”

When Larry King asked Mexico’s Vicente Fox about plans for a “Latin America united with one currency,” Fox answered in the affirmative. He said that one currency was part of the “vision” of the Free Trade Area of the Americas that Bush agreed to in the Declaration of Quebec City in 2001.

So now we know why the Bush Administration won’t build a fence to interfere with “labor mobility” across open borders. Now we know why Bush won’t pardon Ignatio Ramos and Jose Compean, while winking at the prosecutor’s deal to give immunity to a professional drug smuggler.

Now we know why Bush thumbed his nose at the overwhelming congressional votes (411-3 in the House and 75-23 in the Senate) to exclude Mexican trucks from U.S. roads. Now we know why Bush has been more persistent in pursuing “totalization” to put illegal aliens into Social Security than to promote his proposal to privatize a small part of Social Security for American citizens.

This is no conspiracy. It’s all part of the “economic integration” of the North American countries that’s been openly talked about for years.

Yet, today and tomorrow, the 3 countries will be meeting again in New Orleans, LA.

From Lonewacko:

The fourth annual “North American Leaders Summit” – part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership started by George Bush – will be held Monday and Tuesday in New Orleans and will be attended by Bush, Felipe Calderon of Mexico, and Stephen Harper of Canada. Expect the news reports about the event to be credulous.

The same time President Bush is in NOLA for the SPP summit he will be in attendance to help celebrate the re-opening of the Mexican consulate. After Katrina NOLA was flooded with “workers” from Mexico and Central America. Contractors canceled construction contracts with companies with American workers to go with companies with illegal aliens for cheaper costs.

Mexico to reopen New Orleans consulte, George Bush to appear

[At the summit], [o]bservers say [Felipe Calderon] is eager to tout the role his 30,000 countrymen played in the rebuilding of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina in 2005… Ricardo Alday, spokesman for the Mexican Embassy in Washington, said New Orleans is a good place for Calderon to remind Bush of Mexican workers’ contributions to the U.S. economy… “I will expect the president to touch on the economic contributions of migrants to the U.S. economy, particularly to an area like New Orleans, where I understand a big part of the cleaning and reconstruction after Hurricane Katrina has been done by immigrants — not just Mexicans, but immigrants in general,” Alday said.

Another item noted from Lonewacko is the support and appearance by LA Lt Gov. Mitch Landrieu however the newly elected Governor Bobby Jindahl isn’t mentioned. Hopefully, Gov. Jindahl doesn’t support the influx of illegal workers to rebuild NOLA.

Other CAII News:
Nearly 300 Illegals Convicted of DUI in North Carolina from Virtuous Republic

Villaraigosa warns ICE to back off immigration raids from The Uncooperative Blogger

Negotiating North America

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email brianbonner90-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: NAU, North American Union, SPP, Security and Prosperity Partnership, Mexico, illegal aliens, Calderone, Bush, Harper, Canada, New Orleans, SPP Summit, regional loop

Here’s something for you to mull over for the weekend. The Demise of Representative Government from Henry Lamb posits this question.

Few people saw it coming. Many are still oblivious. But it is here, and growing: administrative government. What made America great was the creation of a government designed to exercise only the power granted to it by the people who are governed. The Declaration of Independence says it quite clearly: “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed….”

This means that elected representatives make the laws and levy taxes to hire the administrators who administer the laws.

snip…..Administrative government essentially replaced representative government with the creation of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development, which, incidentally, consisted of appointed professionals. The PCSD declared that:

“We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions; more rapid change; and more sensible use of human, natural, and financial resources in achieving our goals.”

This statement displays contempt for the “decision process” of elected representatives, and is only one of 16 declarations that indicate the extent to which the appointed PCSD believed that a professional, appointed government should engineer society.

The PCSD functioned from 1993 to 1999, and it permeated every federal agency. Consequently, its influence permeated state and local government, enforced through what is euphemistically called “economic incentives and disincentives.” This means – in street language – “you do what we say, or you get no federal dollars.”

snip….This same shift away from the consent of the governed is now infecting our Congress. The executive (administrative) branch, has created “working groups” consisting of appointed administrators from Mexico, Canada, and the United States, which work daily to “harmonize” or “integrate” the administrative rules which govern the societies of the three nations. Congress is not needed, nor wanted. Representative government is no longer essential; it is now the administrative government that engineers society by enforcing rules and regulations that carry the weight of law.

NAFTA and CAFTA are major trade policies that were devised by appointed professionals, and approved by a Congress that was either converted, or intimidated. In either case, the result is the same. Through the administratively created Security and Prosperity Partnership, the appointed professional bureaucrats are devising and enforcing public policy that is transforming the nation from a representative government, to an administrative government.

Can you say amero? How about North American Union?

Technorati Tags: PCSD, SPP, Amero, NAU, NAFTA, CAFTA, Representative vs Administrative

From Debbie at Right Truth we find out a subcontractor providing rebar installation for major bridge projects in Mississippi, Louisiana and Tennessee used illegal aliens who did not have valid welding certifications.  Are these welding jobs the jobs Americans won’t do that the pro-illegal immigrationists are always mentioning? 

Talk about public safety!  I just wonder what other possible areas there are unqualified illegal aliens working on infrastructure projects? 

The good thing is that the owner of this company was arrested by ICE on Thursday.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested Jose S. Gonzalez, 32, at his office in Greenville Thursday, according to a news release. Tarrasco Steel was hired as a subcontractor for rebar installation services to major bridge projects in Mississippi, Louisiana and Tennessee. The federal government considers those bridges as critical infrastructure, and they were part of routine inspections of facilities that if damaged could pose a threat to national security and public safety.

“There is a serious public safety concern when illegal aliens, who are not authorized to work in the country legally, and who do not possess valid welding certifications, are employed in the construction of bridges in our communities,” said Michael A. Holt, special agent in charge of the Customs Office of Investigations in New Orleans, in a news release.

BTW – Tarrasco Steel worked on an I-40 project in Memphis.

Other CAII news:
Quarter Ton of Marijuana Equals Free Pass – But Only If You Are An Illegal Alien… from Common Sense America

Dope dealer in Ramos-Compean case cops guilty plea from The Uncooperative Blogger

Canada seems to have it’s own illegal alien problem from The Cooperative Blogger

US Congress blocks key SPP tranport intiative from The Uncooperative Blogger

A Petition from upholdourlaws.com from Conservative Common Man

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII).  If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: Bridges, illegal aliens, immigration, Tarrasco Steel, National Security

Looks like there is a slow chipping away at any of sign of a US border whether it be by land, air or sea.  Dr. Jerome Corsi is reporting on a meeting called the North American Transportation Trilateral which occurred in Tuscon. 

You could be flying Aeromexico or Air Canada from NYC to LA soon.  I wonder who will be sued or who will have to pay when the first Aeromexico flight crashes due to maintenance issues.  Personally, I wouldn’t be a taker on the Aeromexico airlines.  Sorry, but there is too much graft and corruption in Mexico for me to trust any transportation industry coming out of that country.

The transportation secretary is Mary Peters – she’s the same person arranging for Mexican truckers to have the ability to smuggle drugs into the interior of the US and Canada via a legitimate source.  I guess in a way, that’s good.  At least it will make it safer for our Border Patrol agents and all those illegal aliens crossing the border since the drug cartels can just smuggle the drugs into the country in Mexican trucks or jets instead of fighting their way across the border.  Most of the main Mexican trucking companies are now owned by the drug cartels anyway.  Guess they’ll now be buying all the Mexican airlines too.

h/t Immigration Watchdog

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: North American Union, North American Transportation Trilaterl, Aeromexico, Air Canada

Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the FOIA).  This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff describes responsibilities of the agencies within DHS in the execution of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agenda.  Remember SPP is not a treaty (thusly does not allow any Legislative action) and has been signed by no official of the United States yet Secretary Chertoff is enacting DHS agencies to follow and execute directives issued by this agreement.

According to the memorandum signed by Secretary Chertoff:  “…The [Security and Prosperity Partnership] has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico, and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by DHS [Department of Homeland Security] should now be driven by a single agenda:  the SPP.â€?

Go to Judicial Watch for the March 20,2007 release of “Judicial Watch Uncovers 2005 Chertoff Implementation Memo on Security and Prosperity Partnership”.

Most recent Bear Creek Ledger story on SPP – Surrendering our Sovereignty

Other CAII news:
A Two Week Peek At Illegal Immigration In America from Common Sense America

Mock Day Labor Hiring Sites from Right Truth

Immigration Violaters Stage Protest Over Jail Conditions from Violence Worker

Adios to America’s Numero Uno Anchor Baby? from Illegal Aliens Must Go

English vs. Spanish: A Question of Racism? from Illegal Aliens Must Go

Illiterate Immigrants Contribute to Problem from Liberally Conservative

An Apt Analogy for Bush Amnesty from Illegal Aliens Must Go

Problems? What Problems? from Common Sense America

How do you say Reconquesta in Arabic? from Illegal Aliens Must Go

Liberal Hypocrisy on Illegal Aliens from Illegal Aliens Must Go

Georgia continues to battle gang problem from GA Crime Watch

Mexico’s Immigration Law: Let’s Try it Here at Home! from Illegal Aliens Must Go

McCain Reconsidering Immigration Views from Liberally Conservative

An Open Letter to Senator John McCain Mailed 2/3/07 from Illegal Aliens Must Go

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: SPP, North American Union, DHS, Illegal Immigration

Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media has written a fairly concise and straight forward article on SPP or Security and Prosperity Partnership which is a deliberately complicated and obtuse type of under the radar agreement to merge the United States, Canada and Mexico into the North American Union.  You will hear from the likes of Tony Snow this is just an “urban legend” but the activities of our government officials belies this cavalier response. 

Surrendering our Sovereignty

“The Security and Prosperity Partnership was launched in 2005 to ensure continued economic prosperity in Canada, the United States and Mexico, and to increase the security of citizens in all three countries,” says a release from the Canadian government. It sounds innocent enough. Those in attendance are supposed to include, from the government of Canada: Peter MacKay, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Stockwell Day, Minister of Public Safety, and Maxime Bernier, Minister of Industry. Their Mexican and U.S. counterparts are Secretary of Foreign Affairs Patricia Espinosa, Secretary of the Interior Francisco Javier Ramírez Acuña, Secretary of Economy Eduardo Sojo Garza-Aldape, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez.

The Canadian government says that a “media availability” will be held so that photographs can be taken and a few questions asked of the various officials. My question would be: what is the legal basis for the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)? My research can find no legal basis for this complicated process, now about two years old, involving the futures of our three countries.

My interest stems from covering an all-day February 16 conference sponsored by the Center for North American Studies devoted to developing a North American legal system. It occurred to me at this conference, after examining the literature provided to me and hearing the various experts on the panels, that a process has been well underway to merge not only the legal but economic, political, and social systems of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. I wondered how this was all set in motion and what justification there was legally, legislatively or constitutionally, for it to proceed.

On one level, as I discovered at the conference, much of it stems from NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, which was pushed through Congress by President Clinton, getting majorities in both Houses, and bypassing the treaty process that requires a two-thirds vote in favor in the Senate. Clinton knew that he couldn’t get the votes that a treaty required.

President Bush, a supporter of NAFTA, entered the picture on March 23, 2005, when he issued a statement with then-Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and announced the establishment of the SPP. I had reported that the statement was signed by President Bush, but was corrected by a reader who said that, according to the SPP website, it was not. The SPP says, “The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact, no agreement was ever signed.”

Yet I found a statement issued by then-Prime Minister Martin, in which he declared that “President Bush, President Fox and I signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership…” A transcript of a “press availability” from June 27, 2005, shows Carlos Abascal, the Mexican Secretary of the Interior, saying that, “Our three leaders, President Fox, President Bush and prime Minister Paul Martin have signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.”

Why would officials of Canada and Mexico say the document was signed when it was not? Are they simply in error?

I found the text on the website of U.S. presidential documents but it did not indicate a signature had been attached to it. It is not listed under the category of executive orders. I’m no lawyer, but if the document was not signed, what legal basis, justification or force can it have?

A Canadian report describes the SPP as “an international framework for trilateral and bilateral cooperation in North America” that is “not a formal international treaty” or “an overarching binding legal agreement.” But what is an “international framework” that commits U.S. officials from various federal agencies to working with officials of two other countries? Why is such a process not subjected to congressional scrutiny and approval?

It sounds suspiciously like the “non-binding resolution” that the House passed opposing President Bush’s policy in Iraq, except for the fact that, on the basis of this allegedly unsigned SPP document, federal officials have entered into other agreements with the governments of Mexico and Canada which have been signed. In other words, this is a non-binding agreement or announcement that has binding consequences on the American people. The SPP refers, for example, to a “signed” agreement with Mexico on consumer goods and a “signed” agreement with Canada on pipeline regulations. They are described by the SPP as “accomplishments.” Who signed these documents? It doesn’t say. Why should they be signed when the original agreement creating the SPP is not? It doesn’t explain.

White House spokesman Tony Snow has cavalierly dismissed concerns about this process, saying the charge that the U.S. is being submerged in a North American Union and developing a common currency with Canada and Mexico is an “urban legend.” He must be unaware of the deep involvement in this process of Robert Pastor, a former Clinton adviser and Carter official who was behind the North American legal system conference. Pastor, an adviser to every Democratic candidate for president since 1976, is the brain behind the “North American Community,” as he calls it. His support for the Panama Canal Treaty and radical forces in Latin America prompted Senator Jesse Helms, then-chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to threaten to prevent a vote on Pastor’s nomination by President Clinton as Ambassador to Panama. Pastor withdrew his nomination. One of Pastor’s ideas, a “North American Investment Fund” to provide $200 billion to Mexico, was introduced as a bill by conservative Republican Senator John Cornyn.

Snow’s flip comment will not satisfy the growing number of conservatives who find this SPP process to be of dubious constitutionality. Free trade is one thing, but the idea of exploiting NAFTA as part of an effort to develop “North American Institutions,” including a North American Supreme Court with the power to overrule the U.S. Supreme Court, is something else entirely. Yet these are some of the ideas being seriously discussed by those, like Pastor, who believe in “continental thinking.”

The Democrats who have taken control of Congress promised increased oversight of the executive branch. The SPP deserves some of their immediate attention. But Robert Pastor shouldn’t be left off the witness list.

BTW, the Mexican trucks from 100 companies will start moving in the US under a year long pilot program. These trucks will have unlimited access across the country. If anyone thinks that trouble is not going to erupt from this action, they are seriously deluded.  If you start to hear about semi’s going into rivers or having inexplicable accidents on the interstate think of this pilot program.  Anyone who thinks truckers are going to complacently accept Mexican truckers on the road will find out otherwise.  All it will take is hearing a Spanish speaking trucker over the CB and all bets are off. 

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: SPP, North American Union.NAFTA, Mexico, Canada, illegal aliens, immigration, borders

This story keeps getting scarier.

 Previous postings on this issue can be found:

SPP – The North American Union. It’s here, it’s now, it’s in the works!

NAFTA Superhighway

 

Amazing what can be done through regulation thus circumventing legislation (no involvement from Congress). As you see from the map below there’s a statement to use existing roadways but further down you will read about the expansion and buildout of new highways.  If it’s to use existing highways does that mean this transnational highway co-ops use from Americans?  NASCO has some doublespeake going on here. 

NASCO is “dedicated to developing the world’s first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America.”

Specifically, NASCO supports the corridor that encompasses Interstate Highways 35, 29 and 94, and “the significant east/west connectors to those highways in Canada, the United States, and Mexico.” That NASCO is organized around promoting NAFTA trade is obvious.

snip….To get a feel of the NAFTA corridor movement, we also reference CANAMEX, a trade organization that promotes a Western tri-lateral route utilizing I-19, I-10, I-93 and I-15 in the states of Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Idaho and Montana to link the three countries in trade. Another non-profit group, the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI), identifies four bands of NAFTA corridors (Pacific, West, East and Atlantic), all relying primarily upon internationalizing north-south existing interstate highways into NAFTA trade corridors.

snip…..According to the 4,000-page draft environmental impact statement, the plan is to build a 4,000-mile network of new super-highways that will be “up to 1,200 feet wide (at full build-out) with separate lanes for passenger vehicles (three in each direction) and trucks (two in each direction), six rail lines (separate lines in each direction for high-speed rail, commuter rail, and freight rail), and a 200-foot wide utility corridor.â€?

This is scheduled to begin in Texas.  I’m wondering how many residences and businesses are going to be lost in ‘takings’ for the public good to build these “international highways”. 

On March 11, 2005, TxDOT signed a definitive agreement with Cintra Zachry, a limited partnership formed by Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructures de Transport in Spain and the San Antonio-based Zachry Construction Co. “to develop the Oklahoma to Mexico/Gulf Coast element of the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC-35). This agreement calls for the Cintra-Zachry limited partnership to pay Texas $1.2 billion “for the long-term right to build and operate the initial segment as a toll facility.� The initial TTC-35 segment is scheduled to be built roughly parallel to I-35 between Dallas and San Antonio. The final public hearings are scheduled in Texas for July and August.

You really need to read the series of articles by Corsi.  Each article I read by Corsi leaves me stunned by the purely brazen nature of this whole subjugation of the USA to the North American Union.  I also wonder, just who’s paying for these corridors?  Who’s responsible for maintaining these corridors?  Whether it’s the states, Feds or Mexico, Spain, Canada…..doesn’t matter because all enrage me.  There’s no winner for the US in any of the choices.  There’s more too.

Yet, in March 2005, Kansas City signed a cooperative pact with representatives from the Mexican state of Michoacan and with representatives from Lazaro Cardenas, a deep-port town on the Pacific coast south of the Baha peninsula, to increase the cargo volume between Lazaro Cardenas and Kansas City. The goal is to bring super-ships carrying 4,000 containers or more from China and the Far East into Mexico so the containers can be moved into the heart of the United States, bypassing the West Coast ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

snip…As the brochure explains:

Shipments will be pre-screened in Southeast Asia and the shipper will send advance notification to Mexican and American Customs with the corresponding “pre-clearance� information on the cargo. Upon arrival in Mexico, containers will pass through multiple X-ray and gamma ray screenings, allowing any containers with anomalies to quickly be removed for further inspection.

It’s the incremental agenda or the drip, drip, drip plan.  See, then you (American citizen) won’t really see the big picture impact of this deconstruction of the United States plan. 

The plan to put the NAFTA Super-Highway is intended to be done incrementally, designed to stay below the radar of mainstream media attention. The full build-out of the Trans-Texas Corridor’s 4,000-mile planned network is projected to be completed in discrete stages, over the next 50 years. This gives plenty of time to expand the super-highway network incrementally, state-by-state up-and-down the various identified NAFTA corridors.

We should be enormously grateful to Dr. Jerome Corsi and Jim Gilchrist of the Minuteman Project.  In writing a book about the Minuteman Project they stumbled across this information and being the pitbulls these two people are, they wouldn’t let go. 
HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE – Controversy Erupts Over NASCO and the NAFTA Super-Highway by Jerome R. Corsi

I’m just going to keep bringing back these same posts.  People (politicians included, except for Tancredo) just don’t seem to be taking this seriously.  It’s been a month now since my first posting on SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership) which establishes the North American Union.  This union erases our US Constitution along with US borders.  Are you all okay with that?  I can tell you I’m not.  I don’t want the drag of a third world country on the US economy.  Nor do I want the elimination of the Middle Class which is what has happened in Mexico.  I also have no interest in moving the political correctness and Socialism of Canada to the US.  See, in Canada when there’s a political scandal, the government can just shut the media (and blogs) on the subject.  I could actually go on about Canada after having spent a year working there in ’93.  Noooo thank you.   

Original date of this posting – June 19, 2006: 

Here’s some additional information on the story I posted here (originally posted June 1st – this post has links to spp.gov and also explains the actual agreement in further detail). 

What’s being called the NAFTA Super Highway, four football fields wide and stretching from Mexico to Canada along Interstate 35 is advancing by the Bush Adminstration.

Once complete the new highway will move goods from the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas north to the Canadian border. This move will bypass the Longshoreman’s Union in the process without the need for the Teamsters Union, Mexican drivers will be able to access the most modern highway in North America driving right into the heartland of America.

The plan calls for Mexican trucks to enter a fast lane at the border crossing, checked only electronically by the new “SENTRI” system.

SOONEWS.CA – New Multi-Modal Super Highway Planned By Bush

This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst. It is syndicated by Euphoric Reality, and serves to keep immigration issues in the forefront of our minds as we’re going about our daily lives and continuing to fight the war on terror. If you are concerned with the trend of illegal immigration in our country, join the Blogburst! Send an email with your blog name and url to euphoricrealitynet at gmail dot com.

I originally posted this on June 1st.  Since then Jerome Corsi has spent a week in the halls of Congress stumping this issue which from what he said on Liddy's show this week most were unaware of this circumvention technique using regulation to create this North American Union through this euphamistic SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership).  Since I have been reading Rep. Jack Kingston's blog I figured I'd ask a question about SPP for his reaction with his Open Friday Post!  The reaction or response was from one of his Staffers who responded to my posting that yes, they agreed that this was wrong!  When I requested a comment by the Representative I got nothing.  I'm not sure what it takes to get the attention of Congress, maybe a 2×4? 

The 20 work groups of SPP.gov have followed the plan laid out by the Council on Foreign Relations.  Here's some additional information and links from Jerome Corsi at Human Events. 

Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway - Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, bypassing the Longshoreman’s Union in the process. The Mexican trucks, without the involvement of the Teamsters Union, will drive on what will be the nation’s most modern highway straight into the heart of America. The Mexican trucks will cross border in FAST lanes, checked only electronically by the new “SENTRI” system. The first customs stop will be a Mexican customs office in Kansas City, their new Smart Port complex, a facility being built for Mexico at a cost of $3 million to the U.S. taxpayers in Kansas City.

 

President Quietly Creating "NAFTA Plus"  – NAFTA Plus is more the elites’ shared vision of what a merged future will look like. Their ideas are being implemented through the signing of "regulations," not subject to citizens' review. The vision may initially have been labeled NAFTA Plus, but the name gives a mistaken impression of what is at hand, since there will be no single treaty text, no unique label to facilitate keeping tabs. Perhaps for this reason, some civil society groups are calling the phenomenon by another name, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA), an official sobriquet for the summits held by the three chief executives to agree on the future of "North America."

We have also pointed to the Council on Foreign Relations' (CFR) task force report entitled "Building a North American Community" that contains the blueprint for creating a North American Union by 2010. The CFR task force report makes clear that a fundamental goal of the contemplated North American Union would be to redefine boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries.

The Plan to Replace the Dollar with the Amero - Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.” We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.

snip….In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:…….snip……

Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community” called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,” a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.

To read the original portion of this posting click on more – Read the rest of this entry »