<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama doesn&#8217;t have time for Military in Germany  but now he&#8217;s courting Milspouses?</title>
	<link>http://bearcreekledger.com/2008/08/12/obama-doesnt-have-time-for-military-in-germany-but-now-hes-courting-milspouses/</link>
	<description>US Troop Support and Conservative Banter</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Toni</title>
		<link>http://bearcreekledger.com/2008/08/12/obama-doesnt-have-time-for-military-in-germany-but-now-hes-courting-milspouses/#comment-63225</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bearcreekledger.com/2008/08/12/obama-doesnt-have-time-for-military-in-germany-but-now-hes-courting-milspouses/#comment-63225</guid>
					<description>Lawyer Mama - I don't see in my posting where I said Obama was exploiting anyone.  I also don't see where I  could have implied anyone marrying into the military could be considered a simpleton.  My point is the hypocrisy of Obama.  He cancelled his visit to wounded soldiers in Germany once he found out he couldn't bring his news entourage with him and replaced the time with working out.  

Sorry, I'm not understanding your irony comment either.  I am not a Blue star spouse or mother so you'll need to clue me in on what you mean.  I think you just have a stock comment to anyone who trackbacked to Michelle Malkin's posting since you probably couldn't comment at Malkin's site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyer Mama - I don&#8217;t see in my posting where I said Obama was exploiting anyone.  I also don&#8217;t see where I  could have implied anyone marrying into the military could be considered a simpleton.  My point is the hypocrisy of Obama.  He cancelled his visit to wounded soldiers in Germany once he found out he couldn&#8217;t bring his news entourage with him and replaced the time with working out.  </p>
<p>Sorry, I&#8217;m not understanding your irony comment either.  I am not a Blue star spouse or mother so you&#8217;ll need to clue me in on what you mean.  I think you just have a stock comment to anyone who trackbacked to Michelle Malkin&#8217;s posting since you probably couldn&#8217;t comment at Malkin&#8217;s site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lawyer Mama</title>
		<link>http://bearcreekledger.com/2008/08/12/obama-doesnt-have-time-for-military-in-germany-but-now-hes-courting-milspouses/#comment-63224</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bearcreekledger.com/2008/08/12/obama-doesnt-have-time-for-military-in-germany-but-now-hes-courting-milspouses/#comment-63224</guid>
					<description>Not sure if I should bother to comment but, c'mon.  Exploiting???  That implies that we're all mindless simpletons that couldn't possibly think or make an independent decision. I'd be willing to bet money that I'm more informed on the issues than 99.9% of the population.  Marrying a military man does not mean I lost IQ points.

Blue Star Families for Obama was actually *formed* by military spouses, not the Obama campaign, even though it's now associated. Michelle Malkin didn't do much research before writing her article, so linking to her isn't helping your argument much.

(And I hope you note the irony of your views considering all those political ads in your right hand column....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I should bother to comment but, c&#8217;mon.  Exploiting???  That implies that we&#8217;re all mindless simpletons that couldn&#8217;t possibly think or make an independent decision. I&#8217;d be willing to bet money that I&#8217;m more informed on the issues than 99.9% of the population.  Marrying a military man does not mean I lost IQ points.</p>
<p>Blue Star Families for Obama was actually *formed* by military spouses, not the Obama campaign, even though it&#8217;s now associated. Michelle Malkin didn&#8217;t do much research before writing her article, so linking to her isn&#8217;t helping your argument much.</p>
<p>(And I hope you note the irony of your views considering all those political ads in your right hand column&#8230;.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
