State GOP who oppose RNC on amnesty see pickup in fundraising
With the decline in RNC fundraising (contrary to what they want to believe) due to their promotion and support of amnesty for illegal aliens it looks like the state GOP who oppose amnesty are picking up in their fundraising and donations.
There was the story last week about the decline with RNC collection from small dollar donors and the numbers show this.
From The Washington Times:
The pain is particularly felt at the Republican National Committee. First-quarter fundraising by the national committee this year was the most difficult in four years, according to records of the Federal Election Commission. In the first three months of this year, the committee collected $24.6 million, down from $35 million in the comparable period last year, $32.3 million in the first quarter of 2005 and $46 million in the first quarter of 2004.snip….. The National Republican Senatorial Committee reports similar distress. The Senate committee raised $9.1 million through April — less than half the $18.3 million raised by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee during the same period.
There are several states who have benefited from this grassroots rejection of the national level of the GOP’s stance on supporting amnesty and illegal aliens:
snip….Tina Benkiser, chairwoman of the Republican Party in the president’s home state of Texas, says raising money has been successful “in large part to our principled stance against illegal immigration.” Since the beginning of 2006Both phone and direct-mail fundraising remain strong for the party in Michigan, says state Chairman Saul Anuzis.
“In Michigan, seven out of nine congressional Republicans oppose the bill, our activists are publicly opposing amnesty, and we are also re-establishing our brand image by fighting a Democrat attempt to increase taxes,” Mr. Anuzis says. “These issues are keeping our people engaged, where otherwise we could feel a [donations] drop-off.”
Similar reports from other state Republican officials in Arizona, Colorado, Iowa and Delaware suggest that opposition to any form of amnesty for illegal aliens is a fundraising winner.
snip….In Arizona, where both Republican senators, Jon Kyl and John McCain, support the immigration bill, state Chairman Randy Pullen has strongly opposed the measure, as have most of the other state party officials.
So RNC and NRSC just continue to alienate your base. Calling them nativists and fear mongers and other names will drive the base to an independent status. Oh but you think you’ll pick up all those “Hispanic” GOP members. I wonder how you’re doing on that end? Not good I’d bet.
Other CAII news:
Rally against illegal immigration a success in Cobb County, GA from GA Crime Watch
Press 1 to Donate to your favorite Republican Candidate…Press 2 to tell us to Kiss Off from stikNstein
Give ‘Em an Earful … from Blue Collar Muse
Command and Conquer Red Alert Part 2 Revised from JC Cordray
**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.
Technorati Tags: Amnesty, illegal aliens, S.1348, RNC, NRSC, Hispanic vote,





2996
CentComOnline
Lest They Be Forgotten
Patriot Guard Riders
United Warrior Survivor Foundation
Gold Falcon
Michael Yon







State GOP who oppose RNC on amnesty see pickup in fundraising
Cross posted from  Bear Creek Ledger
With the decline in RNC fundraising (contrary to what they want to believe) due to their promotion and support of amnesty for illegal aliens it looks like the state GOP who oppose amnesty are picking up in their …
Toni –
You forgot to mention that we’re now ‘Restrictionists’. You and I made Adam Kleinheider’s post at Volunteer Voters today. He called those of you who attended Lamar’s Meet n’ Greet on Saturday (and me by extension despite my unfortunate absence) ‘Restrictionists’.
I hadn’t heard that one yet and am unsure what it means. I assume it is a bad application of the clear meaning of language. The bad logic would be that since we oppose illegal aliens being given unfettered access to all aspects of our society we somehow are trying to restrict people or maybe the number of people that can come here. Maybe it’s something different. Maybe Adam will tell us.
In any event, get with the program girl and get your terms up to date. It simply will NOT do to be exclusionary in our language. Why – that could lead to ALL manner of exclusionary thinking.
Blue Collar Muse
Chambliss and Isakson claim they are on the fence
Senator Chambliss does damage control before voting for the new Senate immigration bill…
Terrorist coming from the southern borders?
 Well my post of terrorist coming from the southern borders has struck up some rather strange conversations at work. Seems some think that notion is a bit extreme, but as I read and listen to the news over the last few days I see that what I have fear…
‘Restrictionists’? Wait wait do I fit that class too?? I mean I am already labled as a racist and a bigot due I get a new title now? Can I add this to the list?
If so that would make me a Racist Restrictionists Bigot right?
Keep up the good fight yall.
Public aid, illegal aliens vs veterans
Jerry Davich at the Post Tribune asks, “How can illegal aliens, but not war vets, get public aid?” Obviously a loaded question intent of stirring comments and discussion, but a very interesting topic nevertheless. Davich says” Local veterans voiced two
[...] S.1348 Immigration Bill – 20 Loopholes, State GOP who oppose RNC on amnesty see pickup in fundraising and Lamar Alexander interview with Bill Hobbs (more on amnesty) from Bear Creek Ledger [...]