Chertoff SPP Implementation Memo Uncovered by Judicial Watch
Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the FOIA). This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff describes responsibilities of the agencies within DHS in the execution of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) agenda. Remember SPP is not a treaty (thusly does not allow any Legislative action) and has been signed by no official of the United States yet Secretary Chertoff is enacting DHS agencies to follow and execute directives issued by this agreement.
According to the memorandum signed by Secretary Chertoff: “…The [Security and Prosperity Partnership] has, in addition to identifying a number of new action items, comprehensively rolled up most of our existing homeland security-related policy initiatives with Canada and Mexico, and ongoing action and reporting in the various U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico working groups led by DHS [Department of Homeland Security] should now be driven by a single agenda: the SPP.”
Go to Judicial Watch for the March 20,2007 release of “Judicial Watch Uncovers 2005 Chertoff Implementation Memo on Security and Prosperity Partnership”.
Most recent Bear Creek Ledger story on SPP - Surrendering our Sovereignty
Other CAII news:
A Two Week Peek At Illegal Immigration In America from Common Sense America
Mock Day Labor Hiring Sites from Right Truth
Immigration Violaters Stage Protest Over Jail Conditions from Violence Worker
Adios to America’s Numero Uno Anchor Baby? from Illegal Aliens Must Go
English vs. Spanish: A Question of Racism? from Illegal Aliens Must Go
Illiterate Immigrants Contribute to Problem from Liberally Conservative
An Apt Analogy for Bush Amnesty from Illegal Aliens Must Go
Problems? What Problems? from Common Sense America
How do you say Reconquesta in Arabic? from Illegal Aliens Must Go
Liberal Hypocrisy on Illegal Aliens from Illegal Aliens Must Go
Georgia continues to battle gang problem from GA Crime Watch
Mexico’s Immigration Law: Let’s Try it Here at Home! from Illegal Aliens Must Go
McCain Reconsidering Immigration Views from Liberally Conservative
An Open Letter to Senator John McCain Mailed 2/3/07 from Illegal Aliens Must Go
**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.
Technorati Tags: SPP, North American Union, DHS, Illegal Immigration
The Super Highway and Prosperity Partnership, Chertoff’s for it
Chertoff SPP Implementation Memo Uncovered by Judicial Watch, via Bear Creek Ledger Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch (records received through the FOIA). This memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) Secreta…
Trackback by Right Truth — March 20, 2007 @ 9:10 pm
Chertoff SPP Implementation Memo Uncovered by Judi
Correction: President Bush, Mexico’s President Fox, and the Prime Minister of Canada signed this North American Union agreement in 2005.
Cross posted from Bear Creek Ledger
Blue Collar Republican tells us about a memo received by Judicial Watch…
Trackback by The Uncooperative Blogger — March 21, 2007 @ 10:43 am
Fred Thompson For President…….plain speak on Immigration
Do you know the difference between “SPIT AND SPITSHINE?”
Stiknstein Does………….
Is there a Conservative in the nation who will speak in plain English?
NO…….
WHY?
Because most of them are self serving p…
Trackback by stikNstein....has no mercy — March 21, 2007 @ 12:18 pm
[…] Chertoff SPP Implementation Memo Uncovered by Judicial Watch and Tn House Speaker Naifeh kills English only for drivers license tests from Bear Creek Ledger […]
Pingback by CommonSenseAmerica - Illegal Immigration, America, Freedom, News and Opinion » Illegal Immigration Wednesday Round-Up — March 21, 2007 @ 6:01 pm
Let’s get our definition straight:
trea·ty (n) - a formal agreement between two or more states in reference to peace, alliance, commerce, or other international relations.
Is the SPP an agreement between two or more states in reference to commerce? Yes. It is an agreement between three states regarding matters of international trade, among other things. And I don’t know how much more formal you can get than having dozens of trilateral groups that have been working, albeit clandestinely, for nearly two years now, fleshing out this grandiose agreement by establishing every parameter necessary to coordinate all aspects of (an illusive) North American joint Security (peace) and Prosperity (commerce).
So the SPP most certainly is a treaty, even if there is not some “goddamn piece of paper” (to borrow a phrase from Mr. Bush) that says “Treaty” at the top and has some signatures at the bottom. One could say that it is a de facto treaty, if not a de jure one, about which the vast majority of the American people have been kept in total ignorance.
The SPP is an executive coup … totally without the requisite Congressional approval … let alone discussion with the American people.
Article 2 Section 2 of the Constitution states:
“He [the President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur”
Until very recently, I doubt that two thirds of them had ever even heard of it, let alone been asked their opinion by the Oval Office! Not only has our Imperial Leader failed to obtain the Consent of the Senate, he has deemed their Advice not even worthy of seeking! The man is a total failure at honoring his oath of office to uphold the Constitution. He is the equivalent of the arrogant and stupid little leaders who presided over the demise of the Roman Empire - the only difference being that while they welcomed in the Visigoths, he welcomes in the Hispanic hordes. The fate of Valens would be too good for him.
And as to discussing such a profoundly significant initiative with the people, I challenge you to find a single reference to the SPP in any of his public speeches. Less than 3 months ago in his State of the Union address he said: “We enter the year 2007 with large endeavors underway”. The largest such endeavor, and the one having the most profound potential for radically changing the fundamental nature of this country, is the SPP. But he refrains from mentioning it by name anywhere in his speech!
If it is such a great thing why is he trying to hide it? I’ll tell you why. He’s afraid most of us wouldn’t think it was such a hot idea, and so he wants to get it going with as much mommentum as possible, so that when the people finally discover what he’s been up to it will be a fait accompli.
In the State of the Union speech, the word “security” is mentioned ten times, twice with a capital S when talking about Social Security, and eight times when talking about Iraq. The word “prosperity” is mentioned once in a very general and platitudinous context. And the word “partners” is mentioned once in connection with North Korea. But never do these three words come together to finally lift the veil of secrecy from the darkened eyes of the citizenry and let the vast majority of them learn for the first time of the existence and nature of the truly “large endeavor” that is well “underway” - one whose consequences will reverberate into our nations future long after his Iraq fiasco is relegated to the same dustbin of history as Vietnam.
Comment by Richard Brodie — April 19, 2007 @ 10:30 am