Kidnapped “Peace” Activists show no sign of gratefulness to their rescuers
These supposed peace activists in Iraq who are kidnapped are actually ambivalent towards their rescuers since violence may have been used to facilitate their rescue.
General Sir Mike Jackson, the head of the British Army, expressed the unhappiness of the military last night when he told Channel 4 News that he was “saddened that there doesn’t seem to have been a note of gratitude for the soldiers who risked their lives to save those lives”.
I have a suggestion for the Coalition - anyone who is associated with a “Peace” group (and is in sympathy with the terrorists or as the peaceniks like to call them “insurgents”) who is kidnapped in Iraq should not be offered assistance by the Coalition Troops.
Why would the Coalition expend resources and risk military lives for those who lack the common sense to be grateful?
Army’s top general attacks Kember for failing to thank SAS rescue team - World - Times Online
h/t Lucianne
Those who go on these ‘peace missions’ should be left if
captured, no one can really believe they do any good
whatsoever. What a waste of resources to rescue those
who choose to get themselves into these situations.
Comment by J. Pope — March 25, 2006 @ 6:37 pm
Those who go on these ‘peace missions’ should be left if
captured, no one can really believe they do any good
whatsoever. What a waste of resources to rescue those
who choose to get themselves into these situations.
I’m guessing that’s exactly what Jesus would do.
.
Comment by Jeffraham Prestonian — March 25, 2006 @ 9:05 pm
Couldn’t agree with you more lady! I was at such a loss for words that I simply put the definations of “Rescue” and “Release” on my page just in case those morons needed help understanding the difference. My soldier had 4 combat tours to date and it kills me to know that it is men like him who had to save those who love our enemies.
Comment by Fallen Angel — March 26, 2006 @ 9:38 pm